The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

The second federal bellwether trial is set to begin on August 22, involving a Johnson and Johnson Ethicon vaginal mesh lawsuit claiming serious side effects, in Huskey v. Ethicon.

Huskey received Ethicon Gynecare TVT-O mesh in February 2011, for stress urinary incontinence. After the surgery, Huskey began to complain of severe pain and was diagnosed with severe mesh erosion into her vagina. She continued to experience debilitating vaginal erosions despite multiple surgeries and finally the vaginal mesh was removed in November 2011.

According to Huskey, “she continues to suffer from severe and chronic pelvic pain. All of this impacts her mentally and physically. She suffers from dyspareunia (pain during sex) that will last for days after sex (if she is able to have intercourse at all) as well as depression. She is extremely physically debilitated and can no longer work — leading to large economic losses.”

What are Bellwether Trials?

The lawsuit is a part of a group of cases selected for early trial dates to determine how juries respond to similar evidence and testimony that is echoed throughout the litigation.

These early test cases are called “bellwether” trials, if successful for the plaintiffs, they can pave the way for a global settlement without the need to conduct thousands of individual trials.

Thousands of Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

There are more than 50,000 vaginal mesh lawsuits filed in the federal court system, and all been centralized before U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia.

There are seven separate MDLs, or multidistrict litigations established to control the trans vaginal lawsuit dockets. According to the latest court data from July, there are 18,500 Ethicon mesh, 12,500 Bard Avaulta mesh, 18,000 American Medical Systems (AMS) mesh, 12,000 Boston Scientific mesh, 1,500 Coloplast mesh, 200 Cook Medical mesh and about 75 Neomedic mesh lawsuits.

Plaintiffs Allegations of Serious Side Effects

The plaintiffs allege that transvaginal mesh and bladder sling products were defective and unreasonably dangerous, causing women to experience side effects where the mesh eroded through the vagina, causing severe and catastrophic injuries, including recurrent infections, urinary incontinence and pelvic pain.

Ethicon TransVaginal Verdicts

Earlier in 2014, the first federal Ethicon bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict. Judge Goodwin entered a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiffs case, finding that no reasonable jury could find that she had met her burden of proof.

A third federal Ethicon trial is expected to begin in December 2014.

2 Comments

  1. Gravatar for Nonie Wideman
    Nonie Wideman

    Best wishes for a successful outcome for the plaintiff.... as a mesh victim myself, and advocate for mesh injured women, I cannot express how important it is for the legal team to win ..just not for the plaintiff but all the women suffering from the anything but rare complications of TVTs and anything but inert properties of polypropylene, plus the poorly understood and unresearched autoimmune problems affecting thousands of women with mesh complications.... I hope the judge allows the legal team to open the can of worms regarding the difference between FDA clearance and approval ..... what a travesty that the classification suitable for permanent implant materials was not applied to "TVT mesh implants ... it would have addressed toxicology, degradation of the material, and immune responses .... I wonder who influenced the decision that implant materials needed to only meet the same requirements as medical tools ?

  2. Gravatar for Laurie Jacobs
    Laurie Jacobs

    I would like to know when Ethicon will begin to settle the lawsuits. I have bee miserable for such along time. Age is closing in and we women are being discriminating against. How many men are involved? I'm sure all this would be resolve. .d if men were involved

Comments for this article are closed.